These are traitors who filed a lawsuit against the military complex. They revealed top-secret military secrets!

“National Trust for the Preservation of Historical Heritage” is a beautiful name, but even their name is fake, because when they add the phrase “in the United States” to the name of the National Trust for the Preservation of Historical Heritage, it makes it look like a government institution, while that is not the case. In fact, in 2005, the United States refused to continue funding them because it was strongly opposed to their mission and objectives. They are very harmful to our country. They stop many valuable projects and damage many others.

In this case, they are trying to stop a project that is vital to our national security and to the security of all U.S. presidents, whether the current president or future presidents, their families, their staff, and the members of their cabinets. The U.S. Army had asked them not to bring this lawsuit because of the extremely sensitive nature of the important facilities being built. Senior military officials and commanders, as well as the Secret Service, had shown them detailed maps and exact specifications of this interlinked, integrated, and coherent structure. But this did not stop them because they are afflicted with the Trump derangement syndrome, which is usually known as “TDS,” as Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania has also referred to.

The lower part cannot work without the upper part, and likewise, the upper part cannot work without the lower part. All of it is a fully integrated, coordinated unit.

The then president of the National Trust for the Preservation of Historical Heritage who brought this case, Carol Cowen, had no background in historic preservation and, by unanimous decision with immediate effect, was replaced. This is similar to her exit from Davidson College, where she was also dismissed, but the people of our country have to live with the consequences of her bad decisions; especially her decision to disclose the features of the top-secret military building, for everyone, including our enemies around the world—some of whom have already built theirs and some of whom are still building—such as the drone base that occupies the entire rooftop.

Absolutely there is no argument that a woman who takes her dog for a walk near the White House has the right to sue to stop such a highly needed national security structure—one that will provide the people of the United States with a safe space to carry out the duties of the presidents, current and future—especially while she had never seen the building, because the building had not yet risen from the ground and she had no visual plan or photographs of the building, because they were also still in the early stages of being prepared. This woman is not a “passerby”; she is a professional activist or plaintiff who also participates in many other baseless lawsuits across the city.

In fact, every time the National Trust for the Preservation of Historical Heritage files a lawsuit, it seems that she is also involved. So she was walking by the White House, where there was no building, and that upset her; but does she also walk by all the other places where she should be upset as well, and as a result, generate more lawsuits? She has no security clearance or any expertise in the national security, defense, or protections needed for the president. She absolutely has no right to interfere in this case, and in fact, her name is not even mentioned as a plaintiff in the case! This kind of blatant misuse of the courts is exactly what causes Americans to lose confidence in the justice system. This is very bad for our country!

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States